What DC’s Implied Consent Law Actually Says
Under D.C. Code § 50-1904.02, a driver arrested for impaired driving in the District is deemed to have consented to chemical testing. The law covers two specimens of blood, breath, or urine. The officer chooses which type to collect, not the driver.
Three sections of the D.C. Code work together:
§ 50-1904.02: Implied consent and the specimens police can request after an arrest
§ 50-1905: The warning police must give and what follows a refusal
§ 50-1906: Your right to a hearing and what the District must prove
The Roadside Breath Test Is Voluntary
The small device an officer offers before an arrest is a preliminary breath test, sometimes called a PAS (preliminary alcohol screening) device. Under § 50-1904.01, the officer must tell you that it is voluntary. Declining one of these handheld breathalyzers is not a refusal under the implied consent law. The District also cannot use that result as evidence in a prosecution.
Implied consent applies to the test police request after an arrest, usually at the station.
What the Officer Must Tell You
Before collecting a specimen, the officer must advise you about the law’s requirements. If you decline, § 50-1905 requires a second warning. The officer must tell you that refusal will result in revocation of your privilege to drive in DC.
If you still decline, police give no test. The officer then sends a sworn report to the DMV. That report starts the revocation process. It does not finish it.
Can You Refuse a Breath Test in DC?
Yes. You can refuse a breath test in DC, and refusing is not a separate crime here. Outside of fatal collisions, police do not force a test on a driver who declines.
A refusal does carry consequences on two tracks. One runs through the DMV. The other runs through criminal court. Neither one is automatic, and you can contest both.
How the District Must Prove You Refused a Breath Test
The hearing is where drivers win refusal cases. You do not have to prove anything. The District carries the burden, and the burden is high.
Under § 50-1906, the hearing covers two issues:
- Whether the officer had reasonable grounds to believe you were driving, or in physical control of a vehicle, while intoxicated or impaired.
- Whether you refused to submit specimens after your arrest, having been informed of the consequences.
The District must prove these points by clear and convincing evidence.
It cannot rest its case on hearsay alone, so a police report by itself is not enough. Once you request a hearing, the officers must appear and testify.
How Drivers Win Refusal Hearings
The Wrong Officer Appears
The officer who ran the field sobriety tests often shows up instead of the officer who requested the breath test. That officer may not have witnessed the refusal.
No Officer Appears
Sometimes no one comes. Without a witness, the District cannot meet its burden.
The Proof Falls Short
Even with the right officer in the room, the testimony may not establish a clear refusal or a proper warning.
The Arrest Lacked Reasonable Grounds
Cross-examination can expose weak grounds for the stop or the arrest.
Our attorneys check for each of these problems before and during a refusal hearing. No lawyer can promise a result at a license suspension hearing. Still, a driver who requests the hearing has a real chance to keep driving. A driver who skips it has none.
202-630-0926
Contact a Dedicated Washington DC DUI Lawyer
If you or somebody you know has been charged with a DUI in DC, contact Jason Kalafat of Scrofano Law at 202-630-0949 today to start developing an effective defense.




